Ok. if that what you think, lets try this out. just pretend toronto is America
now lets imagine that 10% more people start carrying a gun.
You dont think there would be more shootings in toronto ?
That's not a fair question unless you specify WHO these people are.
10% more firearms in the hands of police officers? Most likely wouldn't be more shootings. \ 10% more firearms in the hands of law abiding firearm owners? Once again most likely wouldn't be more shootings
10% more in the hands of criminals? Most likely you'd have MORE shootings.
This isn't complicated its common sense. Yet you try to overlook WHO has the firearms and simply try to put the blame on the firearm like somehow it has the ability to load itself, point itself at an individual and keep shooting until someone dies.
if you cant figure out what I wrote, theres no point continuing with you.
Post by scubasteve on Jan 13, 2015 21:58:35 GMT -5
Another interesting thought is that a gun in use far more often in robberies in the US and that makes sense if you are going to rob someone with a gun you better bring one. If you are robbing a house and think the homeowner is going to be armed you would be far more likely to shoot.
its a simple fact, give up on Gun control, and violence WILL rise. Vigilantism will happen. more people will die from gunshots.
you guys that want to carry guns for personal protection... do you also carry knives ?
Everything you said is false. If it were true and simply the presence of guns increases gun violence how do you explain switzerland? 45.7 guns per 100 citizens yet 1/7th the gun violence? Usa has 90 guns per 100 citizens, therefore by using your logic shouldn't switzerland have half the gun violence than the usa? Yet it doesn't...
Canada btw has 30 firearms per 100 citizens.
But don't compare one country to another, compare a whole handful of them and see what happens.
That's not a fair question unless you specify WHO these people are.
10% more firearms in the hands of police officers? Most likely wouldn't be more shootings. \ 10% more firearms in the hands of law abiding firearm owners? Once again most likely wouldn't be more shootings
10% more in the hands of criminals? Most likely you'd have MORE shootings.
This isn't complicated its common sense. Yet you try to overlook WHO has the firearms and simply try to put the blame on the firearm like somehow it has the ability to load itself, point itself at an individual and keep shooting until someone dies.
if you cant figure out what I wrote, theres no point continuing with you.
10% of everyone !!!!!!
Wtf? You say 10% of everyone that way you get to skip over the point that the real difference is WHO carries the gun rather IF someone is carrying one.
In order to get concealed carry you would have to be a law abiding citizen in canada and go through the appropriate background checks. This would mean that you are NOT a criminal. How can you overlook this and just put a blanket saying "10% of everyone".
how can you assure the public that your weapon wont be used for crime.
There are only two guarantees in life yetti, one is death and the other taxes. There will always be a small percentage of people who break laws and do stupid shit, This is a fact of life. But we don't ban everyone owning a knife every time someone stabs someone. We don't ban cars every time someone drinks and drives and wipes out an entire family.
Switzerland also doesn't let everyone carry a gun around unless you are security or active military
Majority of swiss citizens have a real assault rifle sitting at home with ammo, a real assault rifle not what the media calls an assault rifle these days lol
Shouldn't it be a blood bath then if the mere presence of firearms = crime?
how can you assure the public that your weapon wont be used for crime.
There are only two guarantees in life yetti, one is death and the other taxes. There will always be a small percentage of people who break laws and do stupid shit, This is a fact of life. But we don't ban everyone owning a knife every time someone stabs someone. We don't ban cars every time someone drinks and drives and wipes out an entire family.
right now there are a limited amount of handguns on our streets. Cops have most.
If a cop goes down, his gun doesnt get lost, no-one steals it. Its controlled. back to your point about guns not firing bythemselves.
you saw that kid playing with the gun... you yourself said it was stupid. further proof that not everyone would act like you. How do you stop the retards getting guns ?
There are only two guarantees in life yetti, one is death and the other taxes. There will always be a small percentage of people who break laws and do stupid shit, This is a fact of life. But we don't ban everyone owning a knife every time someone stabs someone. We don't ban cars every time someone drinks and drives and wipes out an entire family.
right now there are a limited amount of handguns on our streets. Cops have most.
If a cop goes down, his gun doesnt get lost, no-one steals it. Its controlled. back to your point about guns not firing bythemselves.
you saw that kid playing with the gun... you yourself said it was stupid. further proof that not everyone would act like you. How do you stop the retards getting guns ?
How do you know that the majority of handguns are owned by cops? Do you have the statistics on hand or is this another "fact" that you're pulling out of your ass? Do you have the statistics on the amount of handguns in the possession of criminals in canada? how about law abiding firearm owners?
And how do you know that when a cop gets shot his firearm isn't stolen?
And what exactly does a kid playing with a handgun have anything to do with this topic?
Post by scubasteve on Jan 13, 2015 22:27:14 GMT -5
Swiss have strict laws about carrying guns you need a good reason to be approved like a security guard. They also have strict laws on transportation of guns kind of like we have here.
Switzerland also doesn't let everyone carry a gun around unless you are security or active military
Majority of swiss citizens have a real assault rifle sitting at home with ammo, a real assault rifle not what the media calls an assault rifle these days lol
Shouldn't it be a blood bath then if the mere presence of firearms = crime?
Switzerland also has mandatory military service - who's being obtuse now?
Post by scubasteve on Jan 13, 2015 22:39:05 GMT -5
Switzerland also took away the ammo from military members in 07 they now only have the gun and no ammo the ammo is at the base and the gun must be unloaded before leaving. The mp s and special forces are the only ones allowed ammo now. Seems like they have a good system shooting ranges are plentiful but the ammo must be bought and used there.
Swiss have strict laws about carrying guns you need a good reason to be approved like a security guard. They also have strict laws on transportation of guns kind of like we have here.
What? lol
I though yettis argument was "more guns = more crime"
I show you guys that its not the case and now you change the argument?
Last Edit: Jan 13, 2015 22:43:14 GMT -5 by SpeedFreak
I'll say it. Those idiots like that thug wannabe types who get caught with illegal firearms should get life or something really severe. Maybe that would help with some of the issue. The main issue I see from the middle is stupid people with guns, not the guns themselves.
Switzerland also took away the ammo from military members in 07 they now only have the gun and no ammo the ammo is at the base and the gun must be unloaded before leaving. The mp s and special forces are the only ones allowed ammo now. Seems like they have a good system shooting ranges are plentiful but the ammo must be bought and used there.
But there's a gun in almost every home!!! Why aren't the criminals stealing them and why isn't there blood pouring in the streets as a result?
If more guns = more crime then switzerland should be a blood bath? no?