If you don't know what im talking about you probably live under a rock. How has this become the norm in our world? To top it off they make a whole shitty production out of it like they're making a god damn movie.
They should hire a group of mercenaries & get the god damned job done. No political trail.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. -Malcolm X
If Fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of Liberalism. -Ronald Reagan
And what about all the innocent people they are holding hostage? Anybody stands up to them, they get beheaded. What you guys are saying is that we should have nuked occupied France during World War 2. Bottom line is that had the US not invaded Iraq and had NATO not been supporting the terrorists in Syria, ISIS never would have stood a chance. It's our mess and we need to clean it up, while minimizing the collateral damage with the locals. You'll do a lot more to stem global terrorism with a few conventional munitions tactical strikes in Saudi Ar.. I mean "an unidentified state that's been sponsoring global terrorism for ages" than by nuking all of Iraq and Syria.
And what about all the innocent people they are holding hostage? Anybody stands up to them, they get beheaded. What you guys are saying is that we should have nuked occupied France during World War 2. Bottom line is that had the US not invaded Iraq and had NATO not been supporting the terrorists in Syria, ISIS never would have stood a chance. It's our mess and we need to clean it up, while minimizing the collateral damage with the locals. You'll do a lot more to stem global terrorism with a few conventional munitions tactical strikes in Saudi Ar.. I mean "an unidentified state that's been sponsoring global terrorism for ages" than by nuking all of Iraq and Syria.
Since you're using that analogy about WW2, the same can be said here. Nazis being the radical group, nobody did anything when they slowly rised to power. In fact when the war was raging on in Europe, England was reluctant to join the war. But the war came knocking at their doors. The same thing happened to the americans reluctant to join until they were attacked at Pearl Harbour.
The americans are trying not to do the same mistake twice. I'm not saying what they're doing is right but radical groups with radical ideas should be controlled. When these groups become too powerful they might come knocking at your door. As you can see some of them are attacking us on Canadian soil
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. -Malcolm X
If Fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of Liberalism. -Ronald Reagan
And what about all the innocent people they are holding hostage? Anybody stands up to them, they get beheaded. What you guys are saying is that we should have nuked occupied France during World War 2. Bottom line is that had the US not invaded Iraq and had NATO not been supporting the terrorists in Syria, ISIS never would have stood a chance. It's our mess and we need to clean it up, while minimizing the collateral damage with the locals. You'll do a lot more to stem global terrorism with a few conventional munitions tactical strikes in Saudi Ar.. I mean "an unidentified state that's been sponsoring global terrorism for ages" than by nuking all of Iraq and Syria.
Since you're using that analogy about WW2, the same can be said here. Nazis being the radical group, nobody did anything when they slowly rised to power. In fact when the war was raging on in Europe, England was reluctant to join the war. But the war came knocking at their doors. The same thing happened to the americans reluctant to join until they were attacked at Pearl Harbour.
The americans are trying not to do the same mistake twice. I'm not saying what they're doing is right but radical groups with radical ideas should be controlled. When these groups become too powerful they might come knocking at your door. As you can see some of them are attacking us on Canadian soil
+1
We need to exterminate this cancer before it spreads any further
And what about all the innocent people they are holding hostage? Anybody stands up to them, they get beheaded. What you guys are saying is that we should have nuked occupied France during World War 2. Bottom line is that had the US not invaded Iraq and had NATO not been supporting the terrorists in Syria, ISIS never would have stood a chance. It's our mess and we need to clean it up, while minimizing the collateral damage with the locals. You'll do a lot more to stem global terrorism with a few conventional munitions tactical strikes in Saudi Ar.. I mean "an unidentified state that's been sponsoring global terrorism for ages" than by nuking all of Iraq and Syria.
Since you're using that analogy about WW2, the same can be said here. Nazis being the radical group, nobody did anything when they slowly rised to power. In fact when the war was raging on in Europe, England was reluctant to join the war. But the war came knocking at their doors. The same thing happened to the americans reluctant to join until they were attacked at Pearl Harbour.
The americans are trying not to do the same mistake twice. I'm not saying what they're doing is right but radical groups with radical ideas should be controlled. When these groups become too powerful they might come knocking at your door. As you can see some of them are attacking us on Canadian soil
Did anyone suggest exterminating the Nazis by nuking France/Belgium/Poland? Most of the territory taken by ISIS was taken via a military invasion and held with force. That's the big difference.
The yanks really fucked up here and it's their fault that ISIS came in the first place. We are helping clean up the mess. Obama should take ownership of the mess and stop talking about "no boots on the ground". Do whatever you need to do to clean up your own mess.
People who encourage terrorism attacks, even if they don’t counsel a specific act, could face up to five years in prison under new legislation the federal government wants to pass into law.
For instance, an individual in Canada who posts a video online that includes the phrase “Attack Canada” could be charged with advocating or promoting “terrorism offences in general.”
Individuals could be charged even if they’re advocating attacks against countries or people other than Canada.
The new criminal code offence is a marked departure from the current situation, in which police can only take action when an online posting refers to a specific attack, such as killing a particular category of individuals or targeting a precise location.
The proposed new charge is part of a series of anti-terror measures the Harper government introduced Friday in a bill it says is necessary to protect Canadians in the wake of deadly attacks on soldiers last October that also led to a gunman storming Parliament.
This Anti-Terrorism Act represents the most sweeping increase in power for Canadian security agencies since legislative changes passed in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Other measures include:
Giving Canada’s spy agency the power to intervene and disrupt threats to national security at home and abroad, a major change from its existing mandate where it merely collects intelligence and hands off an intervention role to the RCMP. Give courts the power to order the removal of “terrorist propaganda” from websites operating using Canadian Internet service providers. Making it easier for authorities to restrict the movements of suspected jihadists, meaning they can apply to a court if they only believe terrorist activity “may be carried out.” The previous threshold called on law-enforcement authorities to state they believed an act “will be carried out.” Extending the length of time authorities can detain suspected terrorists for up to seven days from three. Relaxing the threshold needed to prevent suspected jihadis from boarding a plane, allowing the Minister of Transport to bar those whom the government believes are heading abroad to take part in terrorist activities. Granting government departments explicit authority to share private information, including passport applications, or confidential commercial data, with law enforcement agencies.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said these changes are necessary given what he called the war declared by jihadists following a “distortion of Islam.”
“Over the last few years a great evil has been descending over our world,” Mr. Harper told an audience in Richmond Hill, Ont., Friday.
“Jihadi terrorism is one of the most dangerous enemies our world has ever faced.”
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service’s role is currently restricted to collecting intelligence, analyzing and reporting on dangers to Canada, but the newlegislation rewrites its mandate to allow CSIS agents to take action to foil security threats.
Ottawa is building in judicial oversight for this new CSIS power, however, and will require the agency to obtain a court warrant to flex its new muscles. As long as a judge approves, CSIS agents would be able to cancel someone’s travel reservations, for instance, or disrupt a banking transaction or electronic communications.
The new power would lift a fundamental restriction on CSIS’s activities and gives the agency a measure of authority that’s currently reserved for police forces. CSIS, a civilian agency, was created in the early 1980s after an inquiry into the RCMP security service’s illegal activities and civil-rights abuses recommended that policing be separated from intelligence gathering.
The government justifies these changes to CSIS by saying that the agency is often the first in Canada to detect a threat because it’s continually gathering intelligence and conducting surveillance, and is therefore best placed to act to disrupt a new threat before it can grow.
CSIS would still not be a law enforcement agency after these legislative changes. It would not be granted authority to arrest or detain people, for instance.
Today, CSIS informs the RCMP when it detects terror threats and hands the matter off, letting the Mounties conduct their own investigation. Ottawa argues that Canada needs to be able to act more quickly in an environment where terrorist threats can rapidly escalate from concepts to planning to execution, sources say.
The Conservative government holds a majority of seats in the Commons and the legislation is expected to pass easily.
Ottawa is also planning a more robust government financed campaign to thwart radicalization in young people, separate from the legislation being unveiled Friday.
Since you're using that analogy about WW2, the same can be said here. Nazis being the radical group, nobody did anything when they slowly rised to power. In fact when the war was raging on in Europe, England was reluctant to join the war. But the war came knocking at their doors. The same thing happened to the americans reluctant to join until they were attacked at Pearl Harbour.
The americans are trying not to do the same mistake twice. I'm not saying what they're doing is right but radical groups with radical ideas should be controlled. When these groups become too powerful they might come knocking at your door. As you can see some of them are attacking us on Canadian soil
Did anyone suggest exterminating the Nazis by nuking France/Belgium/Poland? Most of the territory taken by ISIS was taken via a military invasion and held with force. That's the big difference.
The yanks really f_ _ _ _d up here and it's their fault that ISIS came in the first place. We are helping clean up the mess. Obama should take ownership of the mess and stop talking about "no boots on the ground". Do whatever you need to do to clean up your own mess.
I'm not saying we should nuke those countries, just control isis. They were getting really powerful really fast
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. -Malcolm X
If Fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of Liberalism. -Ronald Reagan
I'm not saying we should nuke those countries, just control isis. They were getting really powerful really fast
That I agree with. And it's a tough predicament to be in...
If we send them running, they'll come back as soon as we leave. The Iraqi army is crap so they can't handle it on their own. This will make Afghanistan look like a walk in the park any way you look at it.
I'm not saying we should nuke those countries, just control isis. They were getting really powerful really fast
That I agree with. And it's a tough predicament to be in...
If we send them running, they'll come back as soon as we leave. The Iraqi army is crap so they can't handle it on their own. This will make Afghanistan look like a walk in the park any way you look at it.